Cases 61 - 70 of 183
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
URGILES VALLEGO v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2021cv12059
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, VSC, USCIS DANIEL RENAUD, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ACTING DIRECTOR TRACY RENAUD and others
Plaintiff:
MANUEL MAURICIO URGILES VALLEGO and MANUEL M. URGILES VALLEGO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Doe v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2021cv00538
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Daniel Renaud, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
David Gerardo Castillo et al v. William Barr et al
as 8:2020cv02411
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. Attorney Genera William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Mr David Gerardo Castillo, Joaquin Angel Alomar and David Gerardo Castillo
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
