Cases 61 - 70 of 79
McCoy v. Casino
as 5:2013ct03177
Plaintiff:
Darren B. McCoy
Defendant:
Mr. Casino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staton v. USA
as 4:2013cv00065
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darren Arness Staton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Long et al
as 5:2011cv00183
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Darren N. Long, Leigh Ann Long, Elwood Lovell and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Garland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
Larry Darren Garland
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hayes v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv00588
Plaintiff:
Darren Lamont Hayes
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
LIPSCOMB v. HATLEY, et al
as 1:2010cv00450
Plaintiff:
STEVIE LIPSCOMB
Defendant:
DON HATLEY, DARREN WOODS, BILL GRIFFITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sloop et al v. City of Charlotte, North Carolina
as 3:2010cv00144
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Sloop , Michael J. Hervey , Richard F. Korenich and others
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ashcraft, et al v. Conoco, Inc., et al
as 7:1995cv00187
Plaintiff:
Hurshel L. Ashcraft , All Plaintiffs , Frances L. Ashcraft and others
Defendant:
Conoco, Inc. , Kayo Oil Company and Triangle Facilities, Inc.
Movant:
United States of America , J. Harold Seagle, George Rountree, III and others
Respondent:
Kirsten B. Mitchell , Cory Reiss and Wilmington Morning Star
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00468
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
