Cases 61 - 70 of 127
King v. Burton, et.al.
as 1:2015cv13225
Plaintiff:
Patrick King
Defendant:
KATHLEEN BURTON, MICHAEL SANTORO, GREGORY COOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Lopez
as 1:2014cv01854
Plaintiff:
David Bailey
Defendant:
J. Lopez, J. Tangen and M. Vega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitts v. Pinellas County Tax Collector et al
as 8:2014cv02784
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ray Fitts
Defendant:
Pinellas County Tax Collector, Susan Dwyer, David Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Cuviello, I v. Feld Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 14-16793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PATRICK CUVIELLO, I
Defendant - Appellee:
FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., DBA Ringling Bros and Barnum & Bailey Circus, MIKE STUART, Ringling Bros Director of Circus Operations, DAVID BAILEY, Ringling Bros Blue Unit Assistant General Manager and others
Rosales v City of Chico
as 2:2014cv02152
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rosales
Defendant:
City of Chico and David Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
rosales
as 2:2014at01149
Plaintiff:
joseph rosales
Defendant:
City of Chico and David Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Foudy et al v. Indian River County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2014cv14316
Plaintiff:
Shaun Foudy and Toni Foudy
Defendant:
Indian River County Sheriff Office, Deryl Loar, David Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In re: John Bailey
as 14-13555
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN DAVID BAILEY
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bailey et al v. Livingston et al
as TXS/4:14-cv-01698
Plaintiff:
David Bailey , Marvin Ray Yates , Keith Cole and others
Defendant:
Brad Livingston , Roberto Herrera and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Bailey et al v. Livingston et al
as 4:2014cv01698
Plaintiff:
David Bailey , Marvin Ray Yates , Keith Cole and others
Defendant:
Brad Livingston , Roberto M Herrera and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
