Cases 61 - 70 of 251
Barker et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 1:2018cv01161
Plaintiff:
Domitilia Beatrice Ortiz-Valdez, Anthony Reyes, Benny Wilkerson and others
Defendant:
Kidde Fire Fighting, Inc, Kidde PLC, Inc, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Acey et al v. HMS Host USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01395
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Nason, Alexis Jumper, Dana Merklinger and others
Defendant:
Autogrill Group, Inc., HMS Host USA, Inc. and HMS Host Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. v. Gary's Market, a California Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv03208
Plaintiff:
Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Gary's Market, Debi Thomas, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VANCE v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv04878
Plaintiff:
DEBI VANCE
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP , ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2018cv00657
Plaintiff:
Debi J. Perry
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Acrux Commercial Party Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Snyder v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2017cv03625
Plaintiff:
Debi Snyder
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv12790
Plaintiff:
Debi George
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRILLO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv08336
Plaintiff:
DEBIE GRILLO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
