Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Griffin v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2008cv02597
Plaintiff:
Charlie James Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
Joe Ortiz, James Abbott, John Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jerry Stanley v. Robert Ayers, Jr.
as 08-99026
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY F. STANLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT L. AYERS, Jr., Warden of San Quentin State Prison
Stanley v. Arvoid et al
as 3:2008cv04473
Plaintiff:
Jerry F. Stanley
Defendant:
Arvoid, Grundy and Haquman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Griffin v. Ortiz, et al
as 08-1008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES GRIFFIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, Mr., Director of Correction, JAMES ABBOTT, Mr., Warden of C.T.C.F., JOHN SUTHERS, Mr., Attorney General and others
Tuller v. Ritter et al
as 1:2007cv02328
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Tuller
Defendant:
Bill Ritter, Jr., Aristedes Zavaras, Allen F. Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lozano v. Abbott et al
as 1:2007cv02211
Plaintiff:
Jesus Andre Lozano
Defendant:
James Abbott, Randy Foshee, L. Maifield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blount v. Jabe et al
as 7:2007cv00480
Plaintiff:
Donell J. Blount, Sr
Defendant:
John M. Jabe, James R. Camache, T. Pease and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosemary F Stanley v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2007cv01258
Plaintiff:
Rosemary F Stanley
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Stanley v. Ayers, et al
as 4:2007cv03582
Petitioner:
Jerry F. Stanley
Respondent:
Robert Ayers, Jr., Fox and D. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2007cv00179
Plaintiff:
Charlie James Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
Joe Ortiz, James Abbott, John Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
