Cases 61 - 70 of 564
GRAHAM v. RUDOVSKY et al
as 2:2021cv02759
Plaintiff:
ROLAND GRAHAM and RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
MESSING, FEINBERG & LIN, DILP, DAVID RUDOVSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF VITAL RECORDS
as 2:2021cv00846
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF VITAL RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv00590
Respondent:
JAIMIE SORBER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and EUGENE A. VITTONE, II
Petitioner:
TERRANCE GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAHAM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv02851
Plaintiff:
KEVINO GRAHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GRAHAM v. FREELAND
as 2:2021cv00549
Defendant:
LANAISHA FREELAND
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. MORGAN et al
as 2:2021cv01831
Defendant:
MICHELLE MORGAN and MARK GARLAND
Plaintiff:
KEVINO GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2021cv00449
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PATRICK HOMER, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM et al v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2021cv01411
Plaintiff:
ANDRE DAVIS, WYKEEM BASS, ROLAND GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402
GRAHAM v. ESPEL et al
as 2:2021cv00536
Defendant:
ESPEL and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Chonko et al v. Graham
as 4:2021cv00339
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Chonko and Wayne Chonko
Defendant:
Mark R. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
