Cases 61 - 70 of 77
Coffield v. Abbott et al
as 3:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Dale Wainwright, Warden Bridgette Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norman Coffield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosales v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2020cv01496
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott and State Of Texas
Plaintiff:
Juan Rosales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gooden-El v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2020cv00116
Petitioner:
Rayshun Gooden-El and Rayshun Gooden
Respondent:
State of Texas, Governor Greg Abbott, Texas Tarrant County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Abbott et al
as 6:2019cv00684
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Texas Atty. General Greg Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lelane Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liviz Sr. v. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv10304
Defendant:
Governor Charlie Baker, Governor Phil Bryant, Governor Henry McMaster and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist Ilya Liviz Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2019cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Smart
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott, State of Texas and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freedom From Religion Fdn Inc. v. Greg Abbott, et al
as 18-50610
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
GOVERNOR GREG ABBOTT, Chairman of the State Preservation Board and ROD WELSH, Executive Director of Texas State Preservation Baord
Luevano v. Davis
as 4:2018cv02529
Respondent:
Lori Davis
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-20174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clinton Ards v. Greg Abbott, et al
as 17-20707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON LARU ARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR GREG ABBOTT, PAMELA THIELKE, Division Director, KIMBERLI CAMPBELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
