Cases 61 - 70 of 373
HOLMES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv03231
Defendant:
DAVID WRIGHT, SIMON THOMPSON SEMONE and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
KEITH HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. GARMAN et al
as 5:2019cv02854
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK GARMAN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
DUANE MARCEL HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2019cv20197
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MERCK & CO INC
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES v. ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK et al
as 2:2019cv00661
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOLMES
Defendant:
FIVE UNKNOWN NURSES, COUNSELOR MONTE STEPHENS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garban v. Holmes & USOZ, LLP et al
as 4:2019cv00284
Defendant:
Leslie Anne Holmes and Holmes & USOZ, LLP
Plaintiff:
Douglas Garban
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HOLMES v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2019cv00784
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ELYSE HOLMES
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HOLMES v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20034
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORP and MERCK & CO INC
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holmes v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv20000
Plaintiff:
Janette Holmes
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROEBUCK v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2019cv00278
Defendant:
OFFICER CULLEN, OFFICER RUTH, OFFICER STANLEY DAVIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROEBUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
