Cases 61 - 70 of 1,370
Brantley v. WakeMed et al
as 5:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Brantley
Defendant:
WakeMed, Jason Jones, Keith Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORE v. DIVISON OF PRISON DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
ALEX MOORE
Defendant:
DIVISON OF PRISON DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JAMAAL MCQUEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLester v. DeGuehery et al
as 5:2023ct03263
Plaintiff:
David McLester
Defendant:
Dr. Lindsey DeGuehery and Nurse R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. USA
as 1:2023cv00791
Petitioner:
BRUCE WAYNE JONES, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Creel v. Junker et al
as 5:2023ct03243
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Creel
Defendant:
Gary Junker, Dr. Arthur Campbell, Debra Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JONES and RODNEY E. JONES
Defendant:
EDDIE BUFFALOE, SECRETARY EDDIE BUFFALOE, SEC TODD ISHEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mooney v. Howell et al
as 5:2023ct03239
Plaintiff:
Rufus M. Mooney
Defendant:
Superintendent Howell, Associate Warden Williams and Associate Warden Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03234
Plaintiff:
Robert Clinton Henry
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Roderick K. Watson and Timothy P. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. McComas et al
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clayton Jones and Clay Jones
Defendant:
Joseph McComas and Rutherford County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
