Cases 61 - 70 of 126
Rustin v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2013cv03313
Petitioner:
Brandon Eugene Rustin
Respondent:
John S. Wolfe and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. J.C.I. Case Management et al
as 8:2013cv02210
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
J.C.I. Case Management, John S. Wolfe, Frank Bishop, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Hardison v. John Wolfe
as 13-7118
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES FRANKLIN HARDISON
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN S. WOLFE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Hardison v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2013cv01581
Petitioner:
James Franklin Hardison
Respondent:
John S. Wolfe and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darris Ware v. John Wolfe
as 13-6760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRIS ALARIC WARE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN S. WOLFE, Warden, SHALAWNDA SUGGS, Captain, DANIEL A. BICKFORD, Regional Manager MCE and others
Johnson v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2013cv00719
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson
Defendant:
John S. Wolfe and Allen Gang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brader v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2013cv00587
Plaintiff:
John Ernest Brader, Sr.
Defendant:
John S. Wolfe and Allen Gang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wessie Sims v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 13-1398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESSIE SIMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
MARTIN G. BEDNAREK, LYNETTE M. BROWN, CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Green v. Wolfe
as 8:2013cv00413
Petitioner:
Terrence Arthur Green
Respondent:
John S. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davidson v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Bryant Elliott Davidson
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Division of Corrections, John S. Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
