Cases 61 - 70 of 129
Greenwell v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
Reginald Greenwell, Jr
Defendant:
David Gladieux and John Does/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLLIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00365
Defendant:
ALL MEMBERS OF THE UTILIZATION REVIEW COMMITTEE, T. BAILEY, T. BIXLER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Baker v. Kroemer et al
as 1:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
Reginald Baker
Defendant:
Corporal Kroemer, Keely Davis, Robert Glasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Meade et al
as 3:2014cv01669
Defendant:
Darcy Meade, Cory LNU and John Does/Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Jason L Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v City of Fort Wayne et al
as 1:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Marcus Woodson
Defendant:
Fort Wayne City of and John Does/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KADAMOVAS v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, JOHN CARAWAY, JOHN AND JANE DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICALS and others
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Franklin v. Himelick et al
as 1:2014cv00050
Defendant:
Darrell Himelick, Kathy Lee, Captain Albertson and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of Indiana The et al
as 4:2014cv00007
Plaintiff:
Craig F Brown
Defendant:
State of Indiana The, John and Jane Does 1-400, All Indiana State Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Fries et al
as 1:2013cv00359
Plaintiff:
David Weaver
Defendant:
Ken Fries, Tina Kefaber, Jacob E Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2013cv00317
Plaintiff:
Chad D Henry
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Pendleton Correctional Facility, Superintendent Dushan Zatecky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
