Cases 61 - 70 of 147
JONES v. JOSH
as 4:2020cv00134
Defendant:
JOSH
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D. JONES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOSH SMALLING ROOFING AND RESTORATION CO., LLC v. HONEYCOMB PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00850
Plaintiff:
JOSH SMALLING ROOFING AND RESTORATION CO., LLC
Defendant:
HONEYCOMB PRODUCTS, INC. and SENTRY INSURANCE A MUTUAL COMPANY
Cross Defendant:
SENTRY INSURANCE MUTUAL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLLINS v. DURANT et al
as 1:2020cv00793
Defendant:
DECATUR COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JOSH GILLEY, IAN TRESSLER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY LYNN COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Neal et al
as 3:2020cv00192
Defendant:
Christopher Tatum, Jonathan Takacs, Ron Neal and others
Plaintiff:
AC James, Jr
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. BABCZAK et al
as 1:2020cv00598
Defendant:
BRIAN M. BABCZAK, JOSH CAREY and HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
REGGIE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. WOODS et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
CHASE MILLER, K. ALBER, WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
IAN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLANTON v. DECKER et al
as 2:2020cv00092
Defendant:
D. DONALDSON, T. MARK, T. LITTLEJOHN and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARIAH BLANTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Wexford Health of Indiana et al
as 3:2020cv00119
Defendant:
Liawo, Ronda, Davenport and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin v. Isaac et al
as 3:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Josh Hatfield and Joshua Isaac
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
John Baldwin, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. PETERS et al
as 1:2019cv04939
Defendant:
TREASURER'S OFFICE, PAMELA G. SCHNEEMAN, MARION COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
WAYDE COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
