Cases 61 - 70 of 135
Massey, et al. v. Phillips AG, Inc., et al.
as 2:2014cv19475
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Massey and Julia M. Massey
Defendant:
Phillips AG, Inc. and David A. Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zakhia et al v. Trade Logistics Panama S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv20797
Plaintiff:
Barbar El Cheikha Zakhia and Angela Yaritza Gomez
Defendant:
Trade Logistics Panama S.A., Inc. and Julia M Batista
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Warren et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv06315
Plaintiff:
Julia M. Warren and Steven Warren
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELDEM v. ERIN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv02052
Defendant:
JULIA M ANDREWS, ANDREWS & COX, P.C., BLEECKER, BRODEY & ANDREWS and others
Plaintiff:
UMIT ELDEM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thompson v. Ethicon, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv28808
Plaintiff:
Julia M. Thompson
Defendant:
Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weaver v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-24780
Plaintiff:
Julia M. Weaver
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Weaver v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv24780
Plaintiff:
Julia M. Weaver
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00747
Plaintiff:
JULIA M. HARRIS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Debardelen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv13700
Plaintiff:
Julia M. Debardelen and Rick Debardelen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Debardelen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-13700
Plaintiff:
Julia M. Debardelen and Rick Debardelen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
