Cases 61 - 70 of 608
Grooms v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael James Grooms
Defendant:
Kevin Bell, Melissa Sisco and Does Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowles v. Logan et al
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowles
Defendant:
John Logan and Logan Real Estate Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jones v. Marshall et al
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dewon Jones
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Susan Duffell, Matt Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Cogburn v. WellPath et al
as 4:2022cv01236
Plaintiff:
Kevin Andrew Cogburn
Defendant:
WellPath, Does ACC Security Staff and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv02187
Plaintiff:
Glicenia Carmela Logan
Defendant:
James O Cox, P.K. Holmes, III, David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lemons v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01172
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lemons
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McArtor v. Blansett Enterprises Inc
as 4:2022cv01117
Plaintiff:
Kevin McArtor
Defendant:
Blansett Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Meredith v. Gurun et al
as 6:2022cv06116
Plaintiff:
Kevin O'Neal Meredith
Defendant:
Gurun and Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
