Cases 61 - 70 of 1,342
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv06529
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv01218
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00886
Respondent:
Mr. Thomas Feely, Mr. William Barr, Michael Ball and others
Petitioner:
Olvin Geovany Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rosemond v. Decker
as 20-1825
Respondent:
Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Attorney General William P. Barr, n his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Jean Rosemond
Velez Funes v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00883
Petitioner:
Angel H. Velez Funes
Respondent:
Mr. Thomas Feely, Mr. William Barr, Mr. Jeffrey Searls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Emmanuel v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv21914
Defendant:
Juan Acosta, William Barr, James Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Emmanuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11120
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Odeiu Powers v. U.S. Homeland Security, et al
as 20-12289
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. HOMELAND SECURITY and KEVIN MCALEENAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ODEIU JOY POWERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
