Cases 61 - 70 of 690
Howard Thompson v. State of Florida, et al
as 22-12636
Petitioner / Appellant:
HOWARD L. THOMPSON
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, SHERIFF, SAINT LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA and KEN MASCARA, Sheriff
Boobyyaa v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Mandingo Boobyyaa and Keith Mason
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, T. Campbell, Major Dedge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Boehringer Ingelheim et al
as 9:2022cv81202
Plaintiff:
Harvey L. Thompson
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithCline, Pfizer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Boehringer Ingelham Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2022cv81120
Plaintiff:
Harvey Mr. Thompson and Harvey L. Thompson
Defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTCALS, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC;, Inc Pfizer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Shon Thompson
as 22-3641
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHON L. THOMPSON
Thompson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00397
Petitioner:
Jonathan L. Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
(HC) Thompson v. Bird
as 2:2022cv01196
Petitioner:
Raft Thompson and Raft L. Thompson
Respondent:
Unknown and L. Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Thompson
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Williams
Defendant:
Jonathan L. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Religion
Vodicka v. Ermatinger
as 22-10478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brian E. Vodicka and Steven B. Aubrey
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert L. Ermatinger, Jr., Scott Robert Sayers, Does 1-20, all whose true names are unknown and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
