Cases 61 - 70 of 167
USA v. Jose Ramirez
as 17-10450
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS RAMIREZ
USA v. Jose Ramirez-Hebert
as 17-20207
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS RAMIREZ-HEBERT, also known as Jose Luis Ramirez, also known as Jose Luis Ramirez-Herbert, also known as Jose L. Ramirez, also known as Manahel Parcio, also known as Armando Ramirez, also known as Jose Luis Ramirez-Herbet, also known as Jose Herb
Valdes-Ayala v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv01401
Plaintiff:
Valentin Valdes-Ayala
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Marshals, Angel Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agripino et al v. Ranger Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02238
Plaintiff:
Juan Agripino , Hugo Rangel , Isai Manriquez and others
Defendant:
Ranger Construction, Inc. and Satwant K. Kaler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ramirez et al v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramirez and Santiago Martinez
Defendant:
United States Of America, Tom Vilsack and Kevin Shea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jose Ramirez Perez v. William Sullivan
as 17-70578
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS RAMIREZ PEREZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN
Ramirez et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramirez and Santiago Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America, Tom Vilsack and Kevin Shea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
US v. Ramirez-Rivera
as 17-1053
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO LUIS RAMIREZ-RIVERA, a/k/a Peter Pai
Jose Ramirez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-2444
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS RAMIREZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Jose Ramirez-Herrera v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-2431
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS RAMIREZ-HERRERA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
