Cases 61 - 70 of 94
MCDANIEL v. MEISTER et al
as 1:2013cv00952
Plaintiff:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Defendant:
EMILY JEFFORDS MEISTER, JAMES M. WEBB, JAMES S. PFAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Currie-Woods v. The United States of America
as 7:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Crystal Denise Currie-Woods and Gladys Moore McDaniel
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
PRIORITY HEALTHCARE DISTRIBUTION INC. v. CENTRAL CAROLINA SURGICAL EYE ASSOCIATES, P.A. et al
as 1:2013cv00351
Plaintiff:
PRIORITY HEALTHCARE DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Defendant:
CENTRAL CAROLINA SURGICAL EYE ASSOCIATES, P.A. , SOUTHEASTERN CATARACT LASER CENTER, PLLC , J. MARK MCDANIEL, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
United States of America v. McDaniel Personal Property
as 7:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
McDaniel Personal Property
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
McDaniel v. USA
as 1:2012cv00343
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randall Dequan McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01084
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
MCDANIEL v. USA
as 1:2012cv00799
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
WILLIE DEMARCUS MCDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MCDANIEL v. USA
as 1:2012cv00338
Petitioner:
MARCUS JERMAINE MCDANIEL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Engleman v. Cumberland County, et al
as 5:2012cv00147
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L. Engleman
Defendant:
Cumberland County , George Franks , Earl R. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDANIEL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00652
Plaintiff:
GERALD D. MCDANIEL
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
