Cases 61 - 70 of 186
Franks v. Franks et al
as 3:2017cv00893
Plaintiff:
Daniel Franks
Defendant:
Jeffrey H. Franks, Guardian Angel Productions Inc., Kellie McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mohammadi et al v. Audi AG et al
as 3:2017cv02440
Plaintiff:
Neda Mohammadi , Athena Nelson , Anand Agrawal and others
Defendant:
Audi of America LLC and Audi AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Kersten v. State of California Franchise Tax Board, et al
as 2:2016cv00309
Defendant:
State of California Franchise Tax Board, California Department of Consumer Affairs, Dental Board of California and others
Plaintiff:
Kersten and Timothy A. Kersten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ralph Earl Jones v. Jerry E. Powers et al
as 2:2017cv01844
Defendant:
Robert E. Biglow, Jr., Steve McKenzie and Jerry E. Powers
Plaintiff:
Ralph Earl Jones
Jones v. Powers et al
as 2:2017cv00470
Plaintiff:
Ralph Earl Jones
Defendant:
Jerry E. Powers, Steve McKenzie and Robert E. Biglow, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franks v. Franks et al
as 3:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
Daniel Franks
Defendant:
Jeffrey H. Franks, Guardian Angel Productions Inc., Kellie McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sean Malone et al v. City of Placentia et al
as 8:2016cv01420
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Ainley, Jason Alcala, Joseph Connell and others
Defendant:
City of Placentia and Does
Bonilla et al. v. California Highway Patrol, et al.
as 2:2016cv01742
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Bonilla and Sandra Amaya Bonilla
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol , McKenzie and Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gregory McKenzie v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al
as 2:2016cv05148
Defendant:
Does, Ebony Storey and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gregory McKenzie
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
