Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Gilbrech et al v. Mapco Express, Inc.
as 2:2010cv02614
Plaintiff: Ronald Gilbrech and David Dabbs
Defendant: Mapco Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02092
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Phipps v. Mapco Express, Inc
as 5:2010cv01670
Defendant: Delek US Holdings, Inc and Mapco Express, Inc
Plaintiff: Katie Phipps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02407
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00471
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Grant v. Mapco Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02671
Plaintiff: Ashley Grant, Ashley Grant and Ashley Grant
Defendant: Mapco Express, Inc. and Martha Balfour
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Type: Labor None
Black v. Mapco Express,Inc.
as 5:2009cv01811
Plaintiff: Tammie G Black
Defendant: Mapco Express,Inc. and Mapco Express,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mapco Express, Inc. v. Interstate Entertainment, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv01235
Plaintiff: Mapco Express, Inc.
Defendant: Interstate Entertainment, Inc., Jarrell's of Pensacola, Inc., Kenneth Jarrell and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00586
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?