Cases 61 - 70 of 601
Dalton v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Dalton
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Webber, Ivanov and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14047
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LASK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13535
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL LASK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gramegna v. Dorantes
as 3:2022cv01024
Petitioner:
Michael-Paul Gramegna
Respondent:
Vanessa Dorantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11772
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL PARKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thrun v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv01875
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Thrun and Michael Thrun
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Contreras v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael Contreras and Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Brian Thomas, Brooks W Barfield, Douglas R Woodburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisherman v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00246
Defendant:
Michael Paul, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard James Fisherman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Nalls v. State of OH, et al
as 22-3515
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY NALLS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO, Montgomery County Common Pleas Court, MICHAEL PAUL BRUSH, ANTHONY A. AHBOUD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
