Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Security People, Inc. v. Lee et al
as 3:2015cv03172
Plaintiff:
Security People, Inc.
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee, United States Patent and Trademark Office and Ojmar US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mueller v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO) et al
as 1:2015cv00847
Plaintiff:
Kurt Mueller
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO), Michelle K. Lee and Margaret A. (Peggy) Focarino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Isaac Potter, Jr. v. Michelle Lee
as 15-1670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAAC A. POTTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, JENNIFER KRISP, ROBERTA A. BREN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jennings v. Lee
as 1:2015cv01248
Plaintiff:
James E. Jennings
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Genzyme Therapeutic Products v. Biomarin Pharmaceutical
as 15-1720
Appellant:
GENZYME THERAPEUTIC PRODUCTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Appellee:
BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC.
Intervenor:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Ethicon, Inc.
as 15-1696
Appellant:
In re: ETHICON, INC., a Johnson & Johnson Co., CORDIS CORPORATION, a Johnson & Johnson Co. and ETHICON, INC.
Appellee:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED and ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Intervenor:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Potter, Jr. v. Lee et al
as 1:2015cv00695
Plaintiff:
Isaac A. Potter, Jr.
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee, Jennifer Krisp, Roberta A. Bren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Safwat v. Lee
as 1:2015cv00630
Plaintiff:
Sharif Adham Safwat
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
In re: Trading Technologies
as 15-1664
Appellant:
In re: RAY SMITH, TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. and AMANDA TEARS SMITH
Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
