Cases 61 - 70 of 260
Jordan v. Novastar Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00563
Plaintiff:
Mary Jordan
Defendant:
Novastar Mortgage, Inc., Novastar Mortgage, Inc., Novastar Mortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Speight et al v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Bailey Speight and Rosa M. Speight
Defendant:
Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc., NovaStar Mortgage, Inc. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EL v. NOVASTAR MORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
MAHDI EL
Defendant:
NOVASTAR MORTGAGE, INC. and HOMEQ SERVICING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
SCHWARTZ et al v. NOVASTAR MORTGAGE INC. et al
as 2:2008cv04845
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL SCHWARTZ and RANDI SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
NOVASTAR MORTGAGE INC., SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Novastar Mortgage, Inc.
as 08-511
Petitioner:
In re: NOVASTAR MORTGAGE, INC.
Respondent:
MAE JACKSON
Black v. Novastar Mortgage, Inc., et al
as 2:2008cv01232
Plaintiff:
Michelle Black
Defendant:
Novastar Mortgage, Inc.,, Novastar Mortgage, Inc.,, Novastar Mortgage, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Williams v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv60918
Plaintiff:
Roy Williams
Defendant:
Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. and Novastar Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1654
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
