Cases 61 - 70 of 224
O'Quinn v. Lashbrook
as 3:2018cv02013
Defendant:
J. Lashbrook, C/O Theis, C/O Erwin and others
Plaintiff:
Chester O'Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Johnson
as 1:2018cv04822
Defendant:
Lakisha O Johnson
Plaintiff:
Ray Sans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wade v. Sabo et al
as 3:2018cv01185
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Sabo, Karl Punnier, Charles Germaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen Penoyer v. James Russell, et al
as 18-12184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN L. PENOYER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES T. RUSSELL, Prosecuter, B. J. DRIVER, Circuit Judge, JOSEPH DONAHEY, Attorney and others
Penoyer v. Russell et al
as 8:2018cv01008
Plaintiff:
Allen Lloyd Penoyer
Defendant:
James T. Russell, B. J. Driver, Joseph Donahey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co et al
as 5:2018cv00549
Plaintiff:
James O Johnson and Darrell Turner
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railroad Co and C W & W Contractors Inc
Cross_claimant:
Kansas City Southern Railroad Co
Cross_defendant:
C W & W Contractors Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lippert v. Tomaras et al
as 1:2018cv01891
Plaintiff:
Don Lippert
Defendant:
Tina Tomaras, C/O Johnson, Tralon Durrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Johnson et al
as 4:2018cv00245
Defendant:
Benjamin J. Johnson, Shannon O. Johnson, Winsouth Credit Union Financial Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Risper et al v. Arce et al
as 1:2018cv00937
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Risper, Jr.
Defendant:
Ed Arce, Joan Kubalanza, Sharon O. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greyer v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv07840
Plaintiff:
Fabian Greyer
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Dixon Correctional Center, Lieutenant Rentleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
