Cases 61 - 70 of 25,198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Perez v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Aldo Perez
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Perez v. Fresenius USA MFG
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Perez
Defendant:
Fresenius USA MFG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lozano v. Perez
as 4:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
Sergio Sanchez Lozano
Respondent:
Maria Isabel Herrera Perez
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 9001 International Child Abduction Remedies
Cruz Castillo et al v. Ballester Vargas et al
as 3:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
Jennette M Cruz Castillo and Luis M. Crespo Velazquez
Defendant:
Veroushka Ballester Vargas, Eladio Perez Cruz, Advanced Gastroenterology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
USA v. Rosario-Perez
as 24-50408
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Rosario-Perez, also known as Yayo
Dominguez et al v. Kami Ramen Group Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02189
Plaintiff:
Nallely Dominguez and Marcelino Perez
Defendant:
Kami Ramen Group Inc. and Kami Ramen Bar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Camacho III v. Ma.Elvia Alvarez Ibarra et al
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
OSCAR A. CAMACHO III
Defendant:
MA ELVIRA ALVAREZ IBARRA D/B/A TRANSPORTES PAMAR and MARIO PEREZ-MARQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perez v. Target Corporation
as 1:2024cv21324
Plaintiff:
Manuel Perez
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
