Cases 61 - 70 of 115
Hill v. McCrory et al
as 2:2015cv02017
Plaintiff:
Connie Hill
Defendant:
Pat McCrory, Aldona Z. Wos, Laura Gerald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharma v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2015hc02209
Petitioner:
Siddhanth Sharma
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent, Pat McCrory and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Butler v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2015ct03239
Plaintiff:
John Edward Butler
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Pat McCrory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2015ct03226
Plaintiff:
Milton L. Lawrence
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Pat McCrory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LILES v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2015cv01423
Petitioner:
HAYWOOD LILES
Respondent:
MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, PAT MCCRORY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MIDYETTE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01356
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. MIDYETTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TERRENCE W. BOYLE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galeas v. Cantor et al
as 5:2015ct03212
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Cantor, Harry Brown, Phil Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015hc02156
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sakima El Bey v. Joan Kennedy
as 15-1802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAKIMA IBAN SALIH EL BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOAN KENNEDY, Administrator, Child Support, EDWARD YEAGER, Managing Law Counsel, SALOME IORA SALIH EL BEY and others
CONLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01155
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROWLAND CONLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES C. FOX, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
