Cases 61 - 70 of 150
WEST v. PICKENS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 2:2018cv00230
Defendant:
PICKENS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CHANTEL MCOY, GARY SILVERS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE LIGHTNER WEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEST v. PICKENS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 4:2018cv00234
Defendant:
PICKENS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CHANTEL MCOY, GARY SILVERS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE LIGHTNER WEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drost v. Leopard et al
as 1:2018cv02681
Plaintiff:
Wayne Emory Drost
Defendant:
Capt. Marvin Nixs, Pickens County Detention Center and Lt. Christy Leopard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinnacle Financial Partners v. Richardson et al
as 8:2018cv02584
Defendant:
Anita Richardson and Pickens County School District
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Mother Doe, Father Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Isbell v. Pickens County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 0:2018cv02262
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Isbell
Defendant:
Solicitor Office and Pickens County Law Enforcement Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Finklea v. Pickens County Detention Center
as 4:2018cv02263
Defendant:
Pickens County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Todd Finklea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waldrop v. Pickens County Law Enforcement Center
as 0:2018cv02230
Plaintiff:
Kasey Waldrop
Defendant:
Pickens County Law Enforcement Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Urey v. Pickens County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 2:2018cv02177
Defendant:
Pickens County Law Enforcement Center Medical Staff and Pickens County Law Enforcement Center
Plaintiff:
Fred Russell Urey, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bailey v. Pickens County L.E.C.
as 0:2018cv02012
Defendant:
Pickens County L.E.C.
Plaintiff:
LB Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sartin v. Pickens County Jail
as 4:2018cv01668
Plaintiff:
John Sartin
Defendant:
Pickens County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
