Cases 61 - 70 of 87
CUNNINGHAM v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45201
Plaintiff:
WALLACE R. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Ronald Dandar v. DA Erie Cty, et al
as 11-2928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Defendant - Appellee:
DA ERIE CTY, ATTY GEN PA, JOSEPH A. MASSA, JR. and others
Fred Price v. S. Cunningham, et al
as 11-16429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
S. R. CUNNINGHAM and MULLINS
CUNNINGHAM et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65252
Plaintiff:
DENNIS M CUNNINGHAM and NAOMI R CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haller v. Lipps et al
as 1:2011cv00291
Plaintiff:
Daniel Haller
Defendant:
Thomas Lipps , Denis Holtmeier , Ralph Winkler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Carver-Jordan et al
as 1:2011cv02415
Defendant:
R. Joyce Carver-Jordan , Douglas Bostford , R. Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUNNINGHAM v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52175
Plaintiff:
JACK R. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Cunningham et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02161
Plaintiff:
Houston R. Cunningham, II , Precilla A. Hudson , Odell Hudson and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicles of Georgia, LLC and Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUNNINGHAM v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70147
Plaintiff:
WALLACE R. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUNNINGHAM v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31775
Plaintiff:
WALLACE R. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
