Cases 61 - 70 of 297
Brooks v. Knutson et al
as 1:2021cv00302
Plaintiff:
Virginia Brooks
Defendant:
Randall Knutson, Adam Watterson, Donna Donati and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bustillos v. Randall-Reilly LLC
as 7:2021cv00900
Plaintiff:
Joanne Bustillos
Defendant:
Randall-Reilly LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 ta
People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Dade City's Wild Things, Inc. et al
as 2:2021mc03945
Plaintiff:
People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant:
Kathryn P. Stearns, Stearns Zoological Rescue & Rehab Center, Inc. doing business as Dade City's Wild Things, Randall E. Stearns and others
Ervin v. Woodfin et al
as 2:2021cv00751
Defendant:
ED Fields, Investigator Thomas, Johnny Rocket and others
Plaintiff:
Ervin Rayfield and Rayfield Ervin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houlton v. Bohon
as 2:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
Randall Houlton
Defendant:
Scott Edward Bohon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ayers v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00478
Defendant:
Gaines, Watts, Tunstall and others
Plaintiff:
Jaunes Ayers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Steward Shaw, Officer A. Johnson, Officer Terrell and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McWaters et al v. Houston et al
as 2:2021cv00057
Defendant:
Adam Bruner, April Bruner Webster, Randall Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff McWaters, Chris McWaters and Daisy McWaters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2020cv01778
Plaintiff:
Jesse Randall Barnes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01630
Defendant:
I and I, Alabama Department of Corrections, M. C. Dawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
