Cases 61 - 70 of 176
Rode v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv03151
Plaintiff:
Paul Spencer Rode
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams et al v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2018cv01693
Defendant:
Major Westfall, Officer Kramer, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Vonsean K. Williams, Heather Hood, Marshall Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Davis v. Mrs. Rodely, et al
as 18-1944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA J. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MRS. RODELY, WOOD, POLICE OFFICER COWEN and others
Davis v. Rodely et al
as 3:2018cv00984
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Davis
Defendant:
Mrs Rodely, Wood, Cowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stein v. Callidus Software Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01453
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Callidus Software Inc. , Charles M. Boesenberg , Leslie J. Stretch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Franchi v. Callidus Software Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01443
Defendant:
Kevin M. Klausmeyer, Leslie J. Stretch, Nina L. Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franchi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Davis v. Rodely et al
as 1:2018cv00323
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Davis
Defendant:
Mrs Rodely, Wood, Cowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Johnson v. J. Bendel, et al
as 17-17524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BENDEL, Correctional Officer IV - Badge No. 2491 at Eyman Complex - SMU II, INMAN, Correctional Officer III at Eyman Complex - SMU II, S. ANDERSON, Correctional Officer IV at Florence Complex - CB6 and others
Diaz v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01259
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Elias Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crenshaw v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01260
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
