Cases 61 - 70 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roemer et al v. Fay Servicing, LLC. et al
as 3:2016cv03443
Plaintiff:
John Roemer and Paula Roemer
Defendant:
Fay Servicing, LLC, U.S. Bank Trust National Association and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burnham v. Roemer et al
as 4:2016cv40066
Plaintiff:
Arthur A Burnham
Defendant:
John J Roemer and Maura Tansley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Judicial Subpoena Duces Tecum to United States Attorney's Office in James Roemer v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2016mc01372
In Re:
Judicial Subpoena Duces Tecum to United States Attorney's Office in James Roemer v. The State of New York
Petitioner:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Sandra N. Eddleman v. Joann Roemer Jones et al
as 2:2016cv01703
Defendant:
Does, Katie Jones, Shannon Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra N. Eddleman and Sandra N. Eddleman
Corona v. Roemer et al
as 7:2016cv00686
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Corona
Defendant:
P.O. Roemer, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nauhn, Sr. et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06057
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe, P.O. John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Beindu Nauhn, Dehyetti Nauhn, Dorcas Nauhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roemer Industries, Inc. v. NLRB
as 15-2109
Petitioner Cross-Respondent:
ROEMER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Respondent Cross-Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Scatchell v. Gruber et al
as 1:2015cv07228
Plaintiff:
Gianna Scatchell
Defendant:
Richard C Gruber and Kevin Roemer
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
