Cases 61 - 70 of 825
Puckerin v. Federal National Mortgage Association et. al.
as 2:2018cv06517
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Seterus, Inc. and Seterus Inc.
Plaintiff:
Judy Puckerin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00794
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00796
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coq v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2019cv10367
Plaintiff:
Nels Coq
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Seterus, Inc. and Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myers et al v. Caliber Home Loans et al
as 1:2019cv00596
Defendant:
Phelan Hallinan Diamond and Jones, PLLC, LSF9 Master Participation Trust, Back Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Donohue and Mike Myers
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00187
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Boldrini v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 3:2019cv00563
Defendant:
Lesa Gelb, Dave Ritter, Chase Home Finance LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
SCRIPNICENCU v. LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST et al
as 2:2019cv00647
Defendant:
CALIBER HOME LOANS, MR. ROBERT J. BIRCH, SETERUS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LINDA BONNIE SCRIPNICENCU
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
