Cases 61 - 70 of 121
Reeder v. Annucci
as 18-1145
Defendant:
Borrough, Correction Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility, Tier Hearing Officer Zerniak, P. Drumm, Video Officer and others
Appellee:
Locke, Correction Officer; Upstate Correctional Facility, Donald Uhler, Superintendent, Captain Bishop, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Appellant:
Raszell Reeder
Jackson v. Everett et al
as 1:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jah'keem Jackson
Defendant:
Deputy Everett and Sgt. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Everett et al
as 1:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
Daryl Wilson
Defendant:
Deputy Everett and Sgt. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
Dannel M. Mitchell
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Charles Peck, Craig Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Everett et al
as 1:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kevin Thomas
Defendant:
Deputy Everett and Sgt. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacob Peyton, IV v. John Walrach
as 17-7434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB DOUGLAS PEYTON, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN WALRACH, Warden, HENRY PONTON, Regional Director, B. L. KANODE, Assistant Warden and others
Campbell v. Smith et al
as 1:2017cv07055
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Campbell
Defendant:
Sgt. Smith and Sgt. Desjardine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haile et al v. Langford et al
as 6:2017cv01697
Plaintiff:
John Jay Haile, Sr., C. J. Haile, John Haile, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Sgt. Langford, Sgt. Sanford, Sgt. Q. Dorm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Porter et al
as 6:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Garrin David Smith
Defendant:
D Porter, W Mann, J F Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curles v. Greenville County Jail and Its Employees Involved
as 4:2017cv01765
Plaintiff:
Jimmy B.K. Curles
Defendant:
Ms Mitchell, Ms Sermons, Asst. Warden Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
