Cases 61 - 70 of 357
Goldman v. Brink, et al.
as 3:2021cv00420
Plaintiff:
Paul Goldman
Defendant:
Christopher Piper, Virginia State Board of Elections, Jamilah D LeCruise and others
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Thomas, Jr. and Joshua Stanfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Craig v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2021cv01496
Defendant:
Sgt. Clark, Dep. Kiwan, Sgt. Hess and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Cecil Craig, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26605
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA STANFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLIVER v. WHITTINGTON et al
as 5:2021cv00183
Defendant:
WARDEN WHITTINGTON, OFFICER TURNER, OFFICER DEESE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11287
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIM STANFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STANFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10797
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CALANDRA M STANFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeremy Stanfield v. Tawkify, Inc.
as 21-15399
Defendant / Appellant:
TAWKIFY, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEREMY STANFIELD, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Kevin Stanfield v. Bob Ferguson
as 21-35141
Respondent / Appellee:
BOB FERGUSON
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN A. STANFIELD
Stanfield v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv05092
Defendant:
Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Richard T Stanfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kevin Stanfield v. Andrew Saul
as 21-35042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN A. STANFIELD
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
