Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 755
v. U.S. Dept. Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Fines Penalties and Forfeitures
as 1:2023cv22149
Defendant: U.S. Dept. Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Fines Penalties and Forfeitures
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0983 Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA)
Moreno et al. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al.
as 1:2023cv22153
Defendant: U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Fines Penalties and Forfeitures, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Fines, Penalties and Forfeitures, Miami-Division
Plaintiff: Adriana Moreno, Raul Pedroso and Roimy Pedroso Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0983 Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA)
M & M Wireless Inc. v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
as 1:2023cv04834
Plaintiff: M & M wireless Inc and M & M Wireless Inc.
Defendant: U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 19 U.S.C. § 1595 a Customs Duties: Forfeiture and Other Penalties
Indiana, State of et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff: Indiana, State of, North Dakota, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Florida v. USA, et al
as 23-11642
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2023cv01395
Plaintiff: AMERICAN OVERSIGHT
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
RHC Holding Corp. v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00107
Plaintiff: RHC Holding Corp and RHC Holding Corp.
Defendant: United States, Office of the United States Trade Representative, United States Trade Representative and others
HMTX Industries LLC v. US
as 23-1891
Plaintiff / Appellant: HMTX INDUSTRIES LLC, HALSTEAD NEW ENGLAND CORP., METROFLOR CORP. and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE, KATHERINE TAI, U.S. Trade Representative and others
ACT Lighting Holdings LLC v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff: ACT Lighting Holdings LLC
Defendant: United States, Office of the United States Trade Representative, United States Trade Representative and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00868
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?