Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Junker et al v. Wells et al
as 4:2010mc03033
Plaintiff:
Carol Carlson, Dale Carlson, Lynn Carlson and others
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Defendant:
Carol J. Wells and Roger L. Wells
Wells v. Norfork Regenal Center
as 8:2010cv00301
Defendant:
Norfork Regenal Center
Plaintiff:
Mr. Robin O. Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Foley v. Smith et al
as 8:2010cv00273
Defendant:
Pat Ablinger, Randall Brinegar, City of Danville, Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
James Dean Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Culhane v. Principal Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2010cv03130
Plaintiff:
William J. Culhane, Jr.
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company and Wells Dairy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. Bettenhausen
as 4:2010cv03120
Defendant:
Clark E. Bettenhausen
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Colley v. U.S. Bank
as 8:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
Clovis Colley and Wendy Colley
Defendant:
U.S. Bank and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Retana et al
as 8:2010mc00017
Debtor:
Leonor Elizabeth Retana
Defendant:
Mauricio Antonio Retana
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wells v. Houston
as 8:2009cv00113
Petitioner:
Corey Wells
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wells Fargo Insurance Services of Minnesota v. Mock, et al.
as 8:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Insurance Services of Minnesota and Wells Fargo Insurance Services of Minnesota
Defendant:
Kathy Mock, Quality First Insurance, LLC and Collaborative Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
