Cases 71 - 80 of 170
Williams v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2018cv03270
Defendant:
Anthony E Sullivan, Kess Roberson, Daniel E Shreve and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Williams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Twaddell et al
as 3:2018cv03186
Defendant:
. Williams, William Twaddell, Cameron Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Kenrod Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kruger v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv00825
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Kruger
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Howard Harner, Stephen C. Keim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kruger v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv00512
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Kruger
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jacqueline A. Lashbrook, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Renfro v. Matt Bingham, et al
as 18-40135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. RENFRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT BINGHAM, PETER KEIM, KERRY L. RUSSELL and others
Keim et al v. Brinker International, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00420
Plaintiff:
Helen R. Keim and Joseph A. Keim
Defendant:
Brinker Restaurant Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv00387
Plaintiff:
Cory Gregory
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Randy Pfister, Harry Shalabi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIDD et al v. TREVINO et al
as 1:2017cv03927
Defendant:
KEIM TS INC and DAVID TREVINO
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA KIDD, KALEB VAZQUEZ, KAYLEIGH VAZQUEZ and others
317)780-7050 (fax:
Donald L. Poynter, Donald L. Poynter, Donald L. Poynter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Troutman v. Mutayoba et al
as 3:2017cv00941
Plaintiff:
Jeason Troutman
Defendant:
James Mutayoba, Stephen Keim and David Rains
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keim v. LA Hair Boutique LLC et al
as 7:2017cv02279
Plaintiff:
Suzanne H Keim
Defendant:
LA Hair Boutique LLC, Liquid Properties LLC, Christopher Guest and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
