Cases 71 - 80 of 1,517
Velasco v. Vaughan-Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Victor Velasco
Defendant:
Vaughan-Williams, Losty, Hayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Karp et al
as 3:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Pamela Chapman
Defendant:
Jonathon Karp, Nancy Graham, Hope van Beuren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cleary v. Grossman et al
as 3:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Meghan Clearly and Meghan Cleary
Defendant:
Jane Kupson Grossman and William RJP Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Macy's Inc.
as 3:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Macy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Williams v. Family Dollar Stores of Connecticut, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Williams
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Connecticut, LLC and Family Dollar Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hajati v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
George Hajati
Defendant:
United States Of America, Williams Barr, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jusino v. Reis et al
as 3:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Jusino
Defendant:
Jennifer Reis, Nick Rodrigues, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Tong et al
as 3:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
David J Dunn
Defendant:
William Tong, Sean Scanlon, John Herrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salazar v. Kaya et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Salazar
Defendant:
Kaya, John Doe, Debra Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
