Cases 71 - 80 of 289
Smith et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv01138
Defendant:
Tony Mays and Tony Parker
Plaintiff:
Oscar Smith, Pervis Payne, Henry Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nottingham v. Schliter et al
as 3:2019cv01029
Defendant:
Spencer Curtis, Southern Health Partners, Austin Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02731
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Julie Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrell v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2019cv00067
Defendant:
William M Locke, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emidy v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02671
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and Altria Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Scott Emidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERRELL v. SPARKMAN et al
as 3:2019cv00840
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Genovese
as 1:2019cv00076
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese, Warden
Petitioner:
Curtis Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Seanache Homes, Inc. et al v. Cain et al
as 3:2019cv00625
Defendant:
River Edge Inn, LLC, Mike Todd, Judy Larson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Potts and Seanache Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Morris et al v. City of Ridgetop, Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00631
Plaintiff:
Tillman Bratton, Shawn Taylor, Bryan Morris and others
Defendant:
Sam Rider, Mark Johnson, City of Ridgetop, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
