Cases 71 - 80 of 442
Fenner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv02026
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Lonnie C. Fenner and Lonnie C Fenner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00121
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Chaudoin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Alisha C. Chaudoin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Batie-Bey v. Johnson County Court et al
as 3:2020cv00037
Respondent:
Christine Boyer, Janet Lyness, Johnson County Court and others
Petitioner:
Trapayne C. Batie-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Levell v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00042
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Stacy Levell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00043
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Janet Lynn White and Shawn White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Batie-Bey v. Johnson County Court et al
as 1:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Christine Boyer, Dana Christiansen, Mark Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Trapayne C Batie-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 6:2020cv02022
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Monique Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 6:2020cv02021
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graves et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 6:2020cv02020
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Tim Graves and Mary Graves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
