Cases 71 - 80 of 134
Canton Properties Inc et al v. Parkside Bakery Investment Partners LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
Canton Properties Inc and Bangers LP
Defendant:
Parkside Bakery Investment Partners LLC, Birmingham, Alabama, City of, The and Murray Building Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pope v. Adams et al
as 2:2014cv01324
Plaintiff:
Willie Pope
Defendant:
Annie Marie Adams, Norwood A Kern, Judy Robinson and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton Lumber Company LLC et al v. Murray Guard Inc
as 7:2014cv01210
Plaintiff:
Newton Lumber Company LLC and Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, The
Defendant:
Murray Guard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Murray
as 2:2013mc01482
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Melissa Murray
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Murray v. City of Pleasant Grove Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christopher Murray
Defendant:
City of Pleasant Grove Alabama and John Clenendin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pugh v. Rich et al
as 1:2013cv00387
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marquis Pugh
Defendant:
Ashley Mooney Rich, Grant William Gibson, Charles A. Graddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
