Cases 71 - 80 of 267
BEALS v. CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 4:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
WARREN ALEXANDER BEALS
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIUS DEONTE ALEXANDER
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, EDWARDS, ETHRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACEVEDO v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00291
Petitioner:
NIJUL QUADIR ALEXANDER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TESTANI v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv01697
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER TESTANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLS v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2021cv00088
Defendant:
BRENT MILLER, INDIANA STATE POLICE, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB MILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROMASHKO v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv01283
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROMASHKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pratt v. LaPorte County of et al
as 3:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
Robert Omar Pratt, Jr and Rev. Robert Pratt, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Hagler, Holt, Allen W Ott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRESSLEY et al v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00202
Plaintiff:
NIJUL ALEXANDER, JAMES R. PRESSLEY, AMIN RICKER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
