Cases 71 - 80 of 1,438
MILLER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00984
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ANTHONY MILLER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Turner v. King et al
as 5:2023ct03317
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anthony Turner
Defendant:
Jordan B. King, Robert Evans, Joel G. Stadiem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02248
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
OSK XIV, LLC v. TDC BLUE IV, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00949
Plaintiff:
OSK XIV, LLC
Defendant:
TDC BLUE IV, LLC and ANTHONY H. DILWEG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KERR v. ROGERS, et al.
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
ADAM GATES KERR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFFICER ATIF ABDELRAHMAN GAMAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
ABRAHAM v. MCDOUGAL, et al.
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ABRAHAM, SR.
Defendant:
TRAVIS MCDOUGAL, THOMAS ZOPODVA, C. A. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Croutch v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 3:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Anthony Croutch
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ANTHONY v. RICHMOND COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
RICKIE ANTHONY
Defendant:
RICHMOND COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, JOSEPH G. DAVIS, III, CAMERON KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
