Cases 71 - 80 of 458
Cruz et al v. Concord Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv05469
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Aguilar, Luis Cruz, Luis Ramirez Carramza and others
Defendant:
Concord Police Department, U.S. Attorney Office, Contra Costa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMARO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv31559
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA AMARO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DaSilva-Amaro et al v. Forletti et al
as 7:2021cv05734
Defendant:
Thomas Evers Forletti and Damian Forletti
Plaintiff:
Albertina L Monge and Luciana DaSilva-Amaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm
Amaro v. State of New Mexico
as 1:2021cv00576
Defendant:
State of New Mexico
Plaintiff:
Pedro J. Amaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amaro v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03225
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Luis Amaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMARO v. BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB et al
as 2:2021cv11621
Defendant:
HOME BASICS, INC., BJ WHOLESALE CLUB, INC., JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
MARISELA AMARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amaro-Solis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv01634
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Domingo Amaro-Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amaro v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2021cv04160
Defendant:
The State of New York, The Department of Correction and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Luis Amaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osvaldo Amaro Perez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-71016
Petitioner:
OSVALDO AMARO PEREZ, AKA Osvaldo Amaro-Perez
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Amaro v. State of New Mexico, et al
as 21-2039
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JERRY ROARK, Director of Adult Prisons, JOE WILLIAMS, Secretary of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
