Cases 71 - 80 of 88
Betty Ostergren v. Robert McDonnell
as 09-1723
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BETTY J. OSTERGREN
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT F. MCDONNELL, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Virginia
Amicus Supporting Appellee:
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER
Johnny Huff v. Attorney General of Virginia
as 09-6492
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY R. HUFF
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Joshua McClary v. Fowlkes
as 08-8078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA BRENT MCCLARY
Defendant - Appellee:
FOWLKES, Mrs., Nurse, CLARK, Mrs., Doctor, C. D. DAVIS, Capt. and others
Party-in-Interest - Appellee:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA
Johnny Huff v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 08-7305
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY R. HUFF
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA
Overton v. Attorney General Of Virginia
as 7:2008cv00447
Plaintiff:
Maynard Orville Overton
Defendant:
Attorney General Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joseph Stevens v. Douglas Vaughn
as 08-7090
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH P. STEVENS
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG VAUGHN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA
Turner v. Attorney General Of Virginia
as 7:2008cv00342
Plaintiff:
John Paul "Pops" Turner
Defendant:
Attorney General Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Huff v. Attorney General of Virginia et al
as 3:2008cv00257
Petitioner:
Johnny R. Huff
Respondent:
Attorney General of Virginia and Commonwealth of Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
David Meyers v. Ted Hull
as 08-6421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
TED HULL, Major, J. FRAZIER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA and others
William Church v. U.S. Government
as 08-6282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEBRON ANDREW CHURCH
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
