Cases 71 - 80 of 188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Frederick Banks v. Disney et al
as 2:2016cv05554
Defendant:
Danny Banks, John Brennan, Senator Richard Burr and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
BANKS v. DISNEY et al
as 2:2016mc00650
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DISNEY, DISNEY RESPORTS, ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01081
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Frederick Banks v. CIA, et al
as 16-5119
Petitioner - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Respondent - Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. and others
Boudinot v. Shrader
as 16-217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bruce Pasternack, Reginald Boudinot and Paul Kocourek
Consolidated-Defendant:
Explorer Coinvest LLC, Explorer Holding Corporation and Explorer Investor Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Ralph W. Shrader, C.G. Appleby, Samuel R. Strickland and others
Defendant:
DeAnne M. Aguirre, Shumeet Banerji, Peter Bertone and others
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS PUBLIC SECTOR, LLP v. USA
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS PUBLIC SECTOR, LLP
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
ERNST & YOUNG LLP , BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC. and DELOITTE CONSULTING, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
CACI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. USA
as 1:2015cv01322
Plaintiff:
CACI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
