Cases 71 - 80 of 205
Shaw v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv02259
Plaintiff:
Deanna E. Shaw
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan Stirling, Charles Willams, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vernon Goodwin v. Bryan Stirling et al
as 4:2021cv02051
Petitioner:
Vernon Goodwin
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Kenneth Nelsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01538
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Michael McCall, Emily Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Edwin v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01537
Defendant:
Emily Anderson, Michael McCall, Sam Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Edwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Eugene Patterson v. Bryan Stirling
as 21-6406
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUGENE PATTERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections and SCOTT LEWIS, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution
Hubbard v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00684
Defendant:
Clarissa Brown Finley, Bryan Stirling, Marilyn Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smyth v. Stirling et al
as 0:2021cv00649
Defendant:
Chelsea Johnson and Bryan Stirling
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Smyth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00636
Defendant:
Cynthia Petty, Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Crawford v. Warden Nelson
as 21-6275
Defendant / Appellee:
THE S.C.D.C MUSLIM CHAPLAINS, DIRECTOR BRYAN STIRLING, SCDC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE CRAWFORD, a/k/a Johah Gabriel, a/k/a Jahjah T. Tishbite
Robert Graham, Jr. v. Henry McMaster
as 21-6261
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN STIRLING, Director SCDC and HENRY MCMASTER, Governor
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT GRAHAM, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
