Cases 71 - 80 of 210
Johnson v. Stirling et al
as 6:2021cv03331
Plaintiff:
Alvin Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, C Livingston, R Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Priest v. Stirling et al
as 1:2021cv02878
Petitioner:
Quantae Priest
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Kenneth Nelsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
al-Amin v. Williams et al
as 0:2021cv02738
Plaintiff:
Raqib Abdul Al-Amin
Defendant:
Warden Charles Williams, Denis Patterson and Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. McMaster et al
as 7:2021cv02910
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Foster
Defendant:
Henry McMaster, Alan Wilson, Bryan Stirling and others
4Th Party Plaintiff:
Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banshee v. McMaster et al
as 6:2021cv02602
Petitioner:
Mansa M Y Banshee
Respondent:
Henry McMaster, Bryan Stirling, South Carolina Department of Probation Parole Pardon Services The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crawford v. Atkinson et al
as 9:2021cv02526
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L Crawford and Johah Gabriel Jahjah T Tishbite
Defendant:
Officer Ms. Atkinson, Officer Ms. Kee, Acting Head Nurse Over Lee C.I at Night and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vernon Goodwin v. Bryan Stirling et al
as 4:2021cv02051
Petitioner:
Vernon Goodwin
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Kenneth Nelsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaw v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv02259
Plaintiff:
Deanna E. Shaw
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan Stirling, Charles Willams, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwin v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01537
Defendant:
Emily Anderson, Michael McCall, Sam Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Edwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01538
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Michael McCall, Emily Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
