Cases 71 - 80 of 110
Respess, et al. v. Crop Production Services, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00176
Defendant:
Crop Production Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Keith Respess, Sr. , John Clay Respess , Slades Creek Farm, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OWENS v. USA
as 1:2015cv00720
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TERRY CLAY OWENS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CLAY v. USA
as 1:2015cv00356
Petitioner:
BRANDON LENAIR CLAY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Caiola v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
Michael Caiola , George Buccigrosssi, William Langston and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc., Lumber Liquidators Leasing, LLC, Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Commercial Credit Group, Inc. v. Carlock et al
as 3:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
Commercial Credit Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Grover Clay Carlock, Jr. and Fermin Maldonado, Sr.
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 5:2015ct03003
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
James E. Graham, Stephen J. Murphy, III, A. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REID v. NESBITT et al
as 1:2014cv01088
Plaintiff:
CALEB D. REID
Defendant:
NESBITT, ANTHONY, NORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAY v. USA
as 1:2014cv01043
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
BRANDON LENAIR CLAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Higgins v. Powersecure International, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00388
Plaintiff:
Brandon Higgins
Defendant:
Powersecure International, Inc. , Sidney Hinton and Christopher T. Hutter
Movant:
Maguire Financial, LP , Clay Leslie and Paul E. Moore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
