Cases 71 - 80 of 2,944
Calderon Lopez v. O'Malley
as 24-250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Calderon v. Norsworthy et al
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Agustin Calderon
Defendant:
Christopher L. Norsworthy, Angela N. Chavelier, Hollis Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jallow v. Geffner et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Yaya Jallow
Defendant:
Edward I. Geffner, Leticia Randle, Robert Lashley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baltas v. Jones
as 24-100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE BALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
KIM JONES, In her individual capacity, MICHAEL CALDERON, In his individual capacity, DAVID MAIGA, In his individual capacity and others
Calderon v. Covello
as 24-122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS CALDERON
Defendant / Appellee:
P. COVELLO, Warden
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant:
RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Romero Cardoza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2
Petitioner:
CESAR ADALBERTO ROMERO CARDOZA, HELEN ROXANA JORGE CALDERON and MATEO SEBASTIAN ROMERO JORGE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Diaz-Oneil v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority et al
as 3:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
Jaime A. Diaz-Oneil and Jaime A. Diaz-O'Neill
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, Doriel Pagan, Raquel Matos-Rolon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cruz v. Calderon et al
as 4:2023cv05653
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Defendant:
Calderon, Romero, Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
